Lutzkie NO and Another v Zenith Concessions Ltd (386/2002)
2003年9月26日 In this case an action founded upon a cheque, commenced within that period, was dismissed by the High Court at Pretoria on the grounds that the debt had
SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA - Download
Lutzkie NO and another v Zenith Concessions Ltd 386/02 Size: 115.01 KB; Back. Powered by jDownloads. Quick links. Judgments; Court Roll; Bulletin Archive; Speeches
2003 South Africa: Supreme Court of Appeal Decisions - SAFLII
Rösemann v General Council of The Bar of South Africa (364/2002) [2003] ZASCA 96; [2003] 4 All SA 211 (SCA); 2004 (1) SA 568 (SCA) (26 September 2003) Lutzkie NO
Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa - 2003 - Law Library
26 September 2003: Bock and Others v Duburoro Investments (Pty) Ltd (228/2002) [2003] ZASCA 94 (26 September 2003) 26 September 2003: De Villiers NO and Another v BOE
SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
2020年1月27日 Neutral Citation: Lutzkie NO and another v Zenith Concessions Ltd 386/02. Case No: 386/02
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT
3 Froman v Robertson 1971 (1) SA 115 (A) at 120F-G; Lutzkie another NNO v Zenith Concessions Ltd 2003 (6) SA 643 (SCA) para 6. 4 Ibid. 5 Above, fn 3. 7
Lutzkie NO and Another vs Zenith Concessions Ltd - 2003
Enter the Future of Legal Excellence with SupremeToday AI. Elevate your legal practice with advanced AI-driven research and drafting solutions. Experience unmatched efficiency,
Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa - 2003 May - Law
Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa. The Supreme Court of Appeal is, except in respect of certain labour and competition matters, the second highest court in South
en/120/lutzkie v zenith concessions ltd 2003.md at main
Host and manage packages Security
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA - Southern
about an investment plan developed by United Bank Ltd (‘United Bank’ – the first respondent and first defendant below – now known as Absa Bank Ltd) and Commercial
Lutzkie NO and Another v Zenith Concessions Ltd (386/2002)
2003年9月26日 In this case an action founded upon a cheque, commenced within that period, was dismissed by the High Court at Pretoria on the grounds that the debt had
SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA Download
Lutzkie NO and another v Zenith Concessions Ltd 386/02 Size: 115.01 KB; Back. Powered by jDownloads. Quick links. Judgments; Court Roll; Bulletin Archive; Speeches
2003 South Africa: Supreme Court of Appeal Decisions SAFLII
Rösemann v General Council of The Bar of South Africa (364/2002) [2003] ZASCA 96; [2003] 4 All SA 211 (SCA); 2004 (1) SA 568 (SCA) (26 September 2003) Lutzkie NO
en/120/lutzkie v zenith concessions ltd 2003.md at main
Host and manage packages Security
Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa - 2003 Law Library
26 September 2003: Bock and Others v Duburoro Investments (Pty) Ltd (228/2002) [2003] ZASCA 94 (26 September 2003) 26 September 2003: De Villiers NO and Another v BOE
SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
2020年1月27日 Neutral Citation: Lutzkie NO and another v Zenith Concessions Ltd 386/02. Case No: 386/02
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT
3 Froman v Robertson 1971 (1) SA 115 (A) at 120F-G; Lutzkie another NNO v Zenith Concessions Ltd 2003 (6) SA 643 (SCA) para 6. 4 Ibid. 5 Above, fn 3. 7
Lutzkie NO and Another vs Zenith Concessions Ltd 2003
Enter the Future of Legal Excellence with SupremeToday AI. Elevate your legal practice with advanced AI-driven research and drafting solutions. Experience unmatched efficiency,
Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa - 2003 May - Law ... Law
Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa. The Supreme Court of Appeal is, except in respect of certain labour and competition matters, the second highest court in South
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA Southern
about an investment plan developed by United Bank Ltd (‘United Bank’ – the first respondent and first defendant below – now known as Absa Bank Ltd) and Commercial
Lutzkie and Others v Kilken Platinum (Pty) Ltd and Others
2023年9月20日 Lutzkie and Others v Kilken Platinum (Pty) Ltd and Others (37252/2021) [2024] ZAGPPHC 515 ... In Sandown Travel (Pty) Ltd v Cricket South Africa, the court had occasion to comment the doctrine of election and it said: ‘[31] ... The law on concession states that a party is bound by factual concessions made before a court.
Asmal v Essa (38/2013) [2014] ZASCA 62; [2014] 3 All SA 115
2014年5月14日 Neutral citation: Asmal v Essa (38/2013) [2013] ZASCA 62 (14 May 2014) Coram: MPATI P, LEWIS, MAYA, SHONGWE JJA and MATHOPO AJA Heard: 14 March 2014
Lutzkie and Others v Kilken Platinum (Pty) Ltd and Others ... - SAFLII
2024年5月28日 Lutzkie and Others v Kilken Platinum (Pty) Ltd and Others (37252/2021) [2024] ZAGPPHC 497 ... The law on concession states that a party is bound by factual concessions made before a court. ... Ltd v Southern Sphere Mining And Development Company Ltd and Others ...
Owoniboys Tech. Services Ltd. V. Union Bank Of Nig. Ltd (2003)
2023年5月17日 See Nigerian Maritime Services Ltd. v. Afolabi (1978) 2 SC 79 at 84; Highgrade Maritime Services Ltd. v. First Bank of Nigeria Ltd. (1991) 1 NWLR (Pt.167) 290. It must be remembered that it was the appellant who initiated this case when its property was about to be sold for its failure to pay the debt owed to the respondent.
Lutzkie NO and Another v Zenith Concessions Ltd (386/2002) [2003
Lutzkie NO and Another v Zenith Concessions Ltd (386/2002) [2003] ZASCA 97; 2003 (6) SA 643 (SCA) (26 September 2003) Download original files. PDF format. RTF format. THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA. Reportable. CASE NO: 386/2002. In the matter between : F W A LUTZKIE NO First Appellant. S C LUTZKIE NO Second
Kudu Granite Operations (Pty) Ltd v Caterna Ltd (100/02) [2003]
2003年5月30日 Kudu Granite Operations (Pty) Ltd v Caterna Ltd (100/02) [2003] ZASCA 64; [2003] 3 All SA 1 (SCA); 2003 (5) SA 193 (SCA) (30 May 2003 ... Ltd v Jacobs 1946 TPD 269 the Court held after a consideration of the common law that interest is not recoverable under the condictio causa data causa non secuta or under the condictio
Lutzkie and Others v Kilken Platinum (Pty) Ltd and Others
2024年5月28日 In Sandown Travel (Pty) Ltd v Cricket South Africa, the court had occasion to comment the doctrine of election and it said: ‘ [31] At the bottom of the doctrine of election is the principle that no person can be allowed to take up two positions inconsistent with one another or, as is commonly expressed, to blow hot and cold, to approbate and reprobate.
2003 South Africa: Supreme Court of Appeal Decisions - SAFLII
Rösemann v General Council of The Bar of South Africa (364/2002) [2003] ZASCA 96; [2003] 4 All SA 211 (SCA); 2004 (1) SA 568 (SCA) (26 September 2003) Lutzkie NO and Another v Zenith Concessions Ltd (386/2002) [2003] ZASCA 97; 2003 (6) SA 643 (SCA) (26 September 2003)
Ashoka Concessions Ltd.
Ashoka Concessions Ltd. Ashoka Concessions Ltd. (ACL) is a subsidiary company of Ashoka Buildcon Ltd., (ABL) one of the leading highway infrastructure companies in India. ACL is infrastructure arm of Ashoka group and floated for bringing under one umbrella - BOT road and highway projects.
Telkom SA Ltd v Xsinet (Pty) Ltd (92/2002) [2003] ZASCA 35
2003年3月31日 Hodes AJ's judgment is reported as Xsinet (Pty) Ltd v Telkom SA Ltd 2002 (3) SA 629 (C), in which the facts are fully set out. [2] The respondent, Xsinet (Pty) Ltd ("Xsinet"), carries on business as an internet service provider at premises at De Ville Centre, 1 Wellington Road, Durbanville.
